gitsafehub
github.com/zhjgo/shanhai-oracle ↗

zhjgo/shanhai-oracle

scanned 2026-08-13 · git c88f6f9
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secretsVulnerable dependenciesKnown OSS vulnerabilities6Risky code patternsMalicious dependencies1Project health

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaks none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner 6 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

  • Worth fixing GHSA-f88m-g3jw-g9cj sharp inherited vulnerabilities in libvips: CVE-2026-33327, CVE-2026-33328, CVE-2026-35590, CVE-2026-35591
    /workdirs/scan-d5e61bef-b5ae-49d8-848d-3a5d3d329943/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole. Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272 undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure and parse-time crash via degenerate private cache directives
    /workdirs/scan-d5e61bef-b5ae-49d8-848d-3a5d3d329943/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-13697). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524 undici vulnerable to downstream response desynchronization via retry interceptor
    /workdirs/scan-d5e61bef-b5ae-49d8-848d-3a5d3d329943/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-16728). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54 undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure via whitespace around equals in Cache-Control directives
    /workdirs/scan-d5e61bef-b5ae-49d8-848d-3a5d3d329943/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-14643). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5 undici vulnerable to CRLF Injection via blob-like body 'type' property
    /workdirs/scan-d5e61bef-b5ae-49d8-848d-3a5d3d329943/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-15157). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm undici vulnerable to cookie attribute injection via unsanitized domain and unparsed setCookie fields
    /workdirs/scan-d5e61bef-b5ae-49d8-848d-3a5d3d329943/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-16729). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrep none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddog 1 found

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

  • Worth fixing guarddog-npm-shady-links shady-links match in wrangler 4.123.0
    wrangler
    A dependency shows signs of being intentionally malicious (typosquat, hidden install script, etc.). Fix: Don’t install it until you’ve verified the package. Consider removing it.

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.