rasbt/llms-from-scratch

scanned 2026-06-28 · git ff0b3d9

1 of 6 checks flagged a security issue

🟡 Worth a look

Only 4 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets1Vulnerable dependencies✓Known OSS vulnerabilities—Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies—Project health8

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ 1 found

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

ch05/01_main-chapter-code/ch05.ipynb:310

A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ timed out

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

error: timeout after 1800s

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ couldn’t run

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

error: pypi:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/guarddog", line 5, in <module> from guarddog.cli import cl

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ 8 notes

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

Minor scorecard-overall OpenSSF Scorecard overall: 4.4/10

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-CII-Best-Practices CII-Best-Practices scored 0: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Dependency-Update-Tool Dependency-Update-Tool scored 0: no update tool detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Fuzzing Fuzzing scored 0: project is not fuzzed

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Pinned-Dependencies Pinned-Dependencies scored 0: dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-SAST SAST scored 0: SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Security-Policy Security-Policy scored 0: security policy file not detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Token-Permissions Token-Permissions scored 0: detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.

via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.5.0 · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.