github.com/mrward/test-xamarin-forms-many-nuget-packages ↗
mrward/test-xamarin-forms-many-nuget-packages
scanned 2026-08-11 · git 9525451
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🔴 Needs attention
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional.
Re-check ↻ Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed .
🔑 Leaked secrets ✓ 📦 Vulnerable dependencies 6 🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities 3 ⚠️ Risky code patterns ✓ ☠️ Malicious dependencies ✓ 🩺 Project health —
Chat with this repo
Simplify and Visualize This Repo
Self Host this repo
Check out more work of Developer: mrward
Security checks
🔑 Leaked secrets — Gitleaks ⓘ none found ✓
API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT
📦 Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy ⓘ 6 found · 3 serious
Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).
Serious CVE-2024-51501 CRLF injection in Refit's [Header], [HeaderCollection] and [Authorize] attributes
Droid/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-51501). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Serious CVE-2024-51501 CRLF injection in Refit's [Header], [HeaderCollection] and [Authorize] attributes
FormsManyNuGetPackagesTest/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-51501). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Serious CVE-2024-51501 CRLF injection in Refit's [Header], [HeaderCollection] and [Authorize] attributes
iOS/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-51501). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2024-21907 Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions in Newtonsoft.Json
Droid/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-21907). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2024-21907 Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions in Newtonsoft.Json
FormsManyNuGetPackagesTest/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-21907). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2024-21907 Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions in Newtonsoft.Json
iOS/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-21907). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0
🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner ⓘ 3 found
Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.
Worth fixing GHSA-5crp-9r3c-p9vr Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions in Newtonsoft.Json
/workdirs/scan-13d2c6fd-bb43-4c87-8e39-ace1f0ca9f98/Droid/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-21907). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-5crp-9r3c-p9vr Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions in Newtonsoft.Json
/workdirs/scan-13d2c6fd-bb43-4c87-8e39-ace1f0ca9f98/FormsManyNuGetPackagesTest/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-21907). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-5crp-9r3c-p9vr Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions in Newtonsoft.Json
/workdirs/scan-13d2c6fd-bb43-4c87-8e39-ace1f0ca9f98/iOS/packages.config
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-21907). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0
⚠️ Risky code patterns — Semgrep ⓘ none found ✓
Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1
☠️ Malicious dependencies — Guarddog ⓘ none found ✓
Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0
Project health
A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.
🩺 Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard ⓘ didn’t run
Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0
About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a
published rule . False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.