gitsafehub
github.com/mebus/hsf-training-cmake-webpage ↗

mebus/hsf-training-cmake-webpage

scanned 2026-08-09 · git 2a9ddf4
1 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🔴 Needs attention
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secretsVulnerable dependencies65Known OSS vulnerabilitiesRisky code patternsMalicious dependenciesProject health

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaks none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy 65 found · 4 serious

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

  • Serious CVE-2024-22051 commonmarker: integer overflow in cmark-gfm's table row parsing may lead to heap memory corruption
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-22051). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Serious CVE-2026-54906 concurrent-ruby: rubygem-concurrent-ruby: concurrent-ruby: Synchronization flaw in ReadWriteLock allows unauthorized lock release and denial of service
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-54906). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Serious CVE-2021-28834 rubygem-kramdown: allows arbitrary classes to be instantiated
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2021-28834). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Serious GHSA-353f-x4gh-cqq8 Nokogiri patches vendored libxml2 to resolve multiple CVEs
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (GHSA-353f-x4gh-cqq8). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2023-22796 rubygem-activesupport: Regular Expression Denial of Service
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-22796). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-33176 Rails: Active Support: Active Support: Denial of Service via large scientific notation strings
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-33176). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2023-28120 rubygem-activesupport: Possible XSS in SafeBuffer#bytesplice
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-28120). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2023-38037 rubygem-activesupport: File Disclosure of Locally Encrypted Files
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-38037). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-33169 rails: rails-activesupport: Active Support: Denial of Service via crafted long digit strings
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-33169). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-33170 Rails: Active Support: Active Support: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) due to improper HTML safety flag propagation in SafeBuffer#%
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-33170). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2021-32740 rubygem-addressable: ReDoS in templates
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2021-32740). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-35611 addressable: Addressable: Denial of Service via crafted URI templates
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-35611). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2023-37463 cmark-gfm is an extended version of the C reference implementation of ...
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-37463). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-48wp-p9qv-4j64 Commonmarker vulnerable to to several quadratic complexity bugs that may lead to denial of service
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (GHSA-48wp-p9qv-4j64). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-4qw4-jpp4-8gvp Unbounded resource exhaustion in cmark-gfm autolink extension may lead to denial of service
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (GHSA-4qw4-jpp4-8gvp). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-636f-xm5j-pj9m Several quadratic complexity bugs may lead to denial of service in Commonmarker
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (GHSA-636f-xm5j-pj9m). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-7vh7-fw88-wj87 Several quadratic complexity bugs may lead to denial of service in Commonmarker
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (GHSA-7vh7-fw88-wj87). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-54904 concurrent-ruby: rubygem-concurrent-ruby: concurrent-ruby: Denial of Service due to infinite loop in AtomicReference#update
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-54904). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-54905 concurrent-ruby: Concurrent-ruby: Incorrect write lock granting leading to broken mutual exclusion
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-54905). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-54297 faraday: Faraday: Denial of Service via crafted nested query strings
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-54297). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-25765 Faraday: Faraday: Server-Side Request Forgery via protocol-relative URLs
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-25765). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2018-25032 zlib: A flaw found in zlib when compressing (not decompressing) certain inputs
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2018-25032). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2021-30560 Use after free in Blink XSLT in Google Chrome prior to 91.0.4472.164 a ...
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2021-30560). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2021-3517 libxml2: Heap-based buffer overflow in xmlEncodeEntitiesInternal() in entities.c
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2021-3517). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2021-3518 libxml2: Use-after-free in xmlXIncludeDoProcess() in xinclude.c
    Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2021-3518). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
… 40 more not shown

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner none found ✓

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrep none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddog none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.