kevpar/logrus

scanned 2026-08-12 · git 2a22dbe

2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue

🟡 Worth a look

Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets✓Vulnerable dependencies2Known OSS vulnerabilities2Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies✓Project health—

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ 2 found

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Worth fixing CVE-2022-29526 golang: syscall: faccessat checks wrong group

go.mod

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2022-29526). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
FYI CVE-2026-39824 Invoking integer overflow in NewNTUnicodeString in golang.org/x/sys/windows

go.mod

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-39824). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ 2 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Worth fixing GO-2022-0493 Incorrect privilege reporting in syscall and golang.org/x/sys/unix

/workdirs/scan-91adba35-510e-438c-8bf6-39daf2ab857d/go.mod

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2022-29526). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
FYI GO-2026-5024 Invoking integer overflow in NewNTUnicodeString in golang.org/x/sys/windows

/workdirs/scan-91adba35-510e-438c-8bf6-39daf2ab857d/go.mod

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-39824). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.