hsbt/molinillo

scanned 2026-08-09 · git dd0fbb1

3 of 6 checks flagged a security issue

🟡 Worth a look

Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets3Vulnerable dependencies8Known OSS vulnerabilities8Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies✓Project health—

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ 3 found

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

.travis.yml:11

A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

.travis.yml:11

A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

.travis.yml:11

A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ 8 found

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Worth fixing CVE-2018-1000201 ruby-ffi DDL loading issue on Windows OS

Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2018-1000201). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2020-8130 rake: OS Command Injection via egrep in Rake::FileList

Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2020-8130). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2017-17042 rubygem-yard: (lib/yard/core_ext/file.rb) is vulnerable to directory traversal attacks

Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2017-17042). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2019-1020001 rubygem-yard: Arbitrary path traversal and file access in yard server

Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2019-1020001). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2026-41493 yard: YARD: Information Disclosure via Path Traversal in yard server

Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-41493). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2024-27285 yard: Cross-site scripting in the frams.erb template file

Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-27285). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2026-49342 yard: YARD: Information disclosure via path traversal in static cache lookup

Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-49342). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Minor CVE-2017-8418 RuboCop 0.48.1 and earlier does not use /tmp in safe way, allowing loc ...

Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2017-8418). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ 8 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Worth fixing GHSA-2gw2-8q9w-cw8p Ruby-ffi has a DLL loading issue

/workdirs/scan-40c64132-7d02-40af-a799-e03bf43ee796/Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2018-1000201). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-jppv-gw3r-w3q8 OS Command Injection in Rake

/workdirs/scan-40c64132-7d02-40af-a799-e03bf43ee796/Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2020-8130). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-3jfp-46x4-xgfj yard: Possible arbitrary path traversal and file access via yard server

/workdirs/scan-40c64132-7d02-40af-a799-e03bf43ee796/Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-41493). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-8mq4-9jjh-9xrc YARD's default template vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting in generated frames.html

/workdirs/scan-40c64132-7d02-40af-a799-e03bf43ee796/Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-27285). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-gj4p-3wh3-2rmf Arbitrary file read vulnerability in yard server

/workdirs/scan-40c64132-7d02-40af-a799-e03bf43ee796/Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2017-17042). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-pxcc-8665-phx8 YARD static cache reads raw traversal paths before router sanitization

/workdirs/scan-40c64132-7d02-40af-a799-e03bf43ee796/Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-49342). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-xfhh-rx56-rxcr Path Traversal vulnerability that affects yard

/workdirs/scan-40c64132-7d02-40af-a799-e03bf43ee796/Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2019-1020001). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Minor GHSA-wmjf-jpjj-9f3j RuboCop gem Insecure use of /tmp

/workdirs/scan-40c64132-7d02-40af-a799-e03bf43ee796/Gemfile.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2017-8418). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.