gitsafehub
github.com/derailed/influxdb ↗

derailed/influxdb

scanned 2026-08-04 · git b4fb4b0
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 4 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secretsVulnerable dependencies1Known OSS vulnerabilities1Risky code patternsMalicious dependenciesProject health

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaks timed out

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

error: timeout after 120s

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy 1 found

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

  • Worth fixing CVE-2020-10663 rubygem-json: Unsafe object creation vulnerability in JSON
    etc/burn-in/Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2020-10663). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner 1 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

  • Worth fixing GHSA-jphg-qwrw-7w9g Unsafe object creation in json RubyGem
    /workdirs/scan-86a58a6f-dca3-47f9-9dc6-9a0460ba9b24/etc/burn-in/Gemfile.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2020-10663). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrep none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddog none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.