github.com/619dev/guideng ↗
619dev/guideng
scanned 2026-07-30 · git 22df015
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional.
Re-check ↻
Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed .
🔑 Leaked secrets ✓ 📦 Vulnerable dependencies 1 🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities 2 ⚠️ Risky code patterns ✓ ☠️ Malicious dependencies ✓ 🩺 Project health —
Chat with this repo
Simplify and Visualize This Repo
Self Host this repo
Check out more work of Developer: 619dev
Security checks
🔑 Leaked secrets — Gitleaks ⓘ
none found ✓
API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT
📦 Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy ⓘ
1 found
Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).
Worth fixing GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849 PostCSS: Path Traversal in Previous Source Map Auto-Loading (sourceMappingURL) leads to Arbitrary .map File Disclosure
client/package-lock.json
A package you depend on has a known security hole (GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0
🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner ⓘ
2 found
Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.
Worth fixing GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849 PostCSS: Path Traversal in Previous Source Map Auto-Loading (sourceMappingURL) leads to Arbitrary .map File Disclosure
/workdirs/scan-de5c4334-ce9e-4f5c-b530-41434118be3d/client/package-lock.json
A package you depend on has a known security hole. Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing RUSTSEC-2023-0071 Marvin Attack: potential key recovery through timing sidechannels
/workdirs/scan-de5c4334-ce9e-4f5c-b530-41434118be3d/server/Cargo.lock
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-49092). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0
⚠️ Risky code patterns — Semgrep ⓘ
none found ✓
Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1
☠️ Malicious dependencies — Guarddog ⓘ
none found ✓
Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0
Project health
A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.
🩺 Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard ⓘ
didn’t run
Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0
About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a
published rule . False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.