tencent/matrix

scanned 2026-06-30 · git 3b8293b

1 of 6 checks flagged a security issue

🟡 Worth a look

Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets—Vulnerable dependencies✓Known OSS vulnerabilities1Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies✓Project health8

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ timed out

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

error: timeout after 120s

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ 1 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Worth fixing CVE-2022-35133 A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in CherryTree v0.99.30 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the Name text field when creating a node

/workdirs/scan-98b6a54a-f42d-458e-88ce-b3d154a0efd1/matrix/matrix-android/matrix-backtrace/src/main/cpp/external/libunwindstack/deps/liblzma

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2022-35133). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited — injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious — typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ 8 notes

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project — not a vulnerability in your code.

Worth fixing scorecard-overall OpenSSF Scorecard overall: 2.5/10

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-CI-Tests CI-Tests scored 0: 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-CII-Best-Practices CII-Best-Practices scored 0: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Dependency-Update-Tool Dependency-Update-Tool scored 0: no update tool detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Fuzzing Fuzzing scored 0: project is not fuzzed

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Maintained Maintained scored 0: 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-SAST SAST scored 0: SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Security-Policy Security-Policy scored 0: security policy file not detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.

via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.5.0 · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.