github.com/silvertakana/worldwideview ↗
silvertakana/worldwideview
scanned 2026-07-14 · git 2d59f70
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 4 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional.
Re-check ↻
Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed .
🔑 Leaked secrets — 📦 Vulnerable dependencies 3 🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities 4 ⚠️ Risky code patterns ✓ ☠️ Malicious dependencies — 🩺 Project health 6
Chat with this repo
Simplify and Visualize This Repo
Self Host this repo
Check out more work of Developer: silvertakana
Security checks
🔑 Leaked secrets — Gitleaks ⓘ
timed out
API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT
error: timeout after 400s
📦 Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy ⓘ
3 found
Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).
Worth fixing CVE-2026-39406 @hono/node-server: Middleware bypass via repeated slashes in serveStatic
pnpm-lock.yaml
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-39406). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2026-41305 postcss: PostCSS: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via improper escaping of style closing tags
pnpm-lock.yaml
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-41305). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2023-26136 tough-cookie: prototype pollution in cookie memstore
pnpm-lock.yaml
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-26136). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0
🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner ⓘ
4 found
Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.
Worth fixing GHSA-92pp-h63x-v22m @hono/node-server: Middleware bypass via repeated slashes in serveStatic
/workdirs/scan-8b056c89-2eca-44a4-a782-67ea5159ea62/pnpm-lock.yaml
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-39406). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-qx2v-qp2m-jg93 PostCSS has XSS via Unescaped </style> in its CSS Stringify Output
/workdirs/scan-8b056c89-2eca-44a4-a782-67ea5159ea62/pnpm-lock.yaml
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-41305). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-p8p7-x288-28g6 Server-Side Request Forgery in Request
/workdirs/scan-8b056c89-2eca-44a4-a782-67ea5159ea62/pnpm-lock.yaml
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-28155). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-72xf-g2v4-qvf3 tough-cookie Prototype Pollution vulnerability
/workdirs/scan-8b056c89-2eca-44a4-a782-67ea5159ea62/pnpm-lock.yaml
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-26136). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0
⚠️ Risky code patterns — Semgrep ⓘ
none found ✓
Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1
☠️ Malicious dependencies — Guarddog ⓘ
timed out
Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0
error: npm:timeout
Project health
A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.
🩺 Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard ⓘ
6 notes
Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-overall OpenSSF Scorecard overall: 6.9/10
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-CII-Best-Practices CII-Best-Practices scored 0: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Code-Review Code-Review scored 0: Found 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Contributors Contributors scored 0: project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Pinned-Dependencies Pinned-Dependencies scored 0: dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Token-Permissions Token-Permissions scored 0: detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.5.0 · Apache-2.0
About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a
published rule . False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.