gitsafehub
github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/imbalanced-learn ↗

scikit-learn-contrib/imbalanced-learn

scanned 2026-06-28 · git 8504e95
No security issues flagged
🟢 Looks clean so far
Only 3 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secretsVulnerable dependenciesKnown OSS vulnerabilitiesRisky code patternsMalicious dependenciesProject health

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaks none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy couldn’t run

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

error: 2026-06-28T14:12:28Z FATAL Fatal error run error: init error: DB error: failed to download vulnerability DB: OCI artifact error: failed to download vulnerability DB: failed to download artifact from mirror.gcr.io/aquasec/trivy-db:2: oci download error: copy error: unexpected EOF

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner none found ✓

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrep none found ✓

Code that can be exploited — injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddog couldn’t run

Packages that look intentionally malicious — typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

error: pypi:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/guarddog", line 5, in <module> from guarddog.cli import cl

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard timed out

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project — not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.5.0 · Apache-2.0

error: timeout after 1800s

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.