gitsafehub
github.com/richienb/antivirus-1 ↗

richienb/antivirus-1

scanned 2026-08-11 · git 7caf78c
1 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🔴 Needs attention
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secretsVulnerable dependenciesKnown OSS vulnerabilities7Risky code patternsMalicious dependenciesProject health

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaks none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner 7 found · 2 serious

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

  • Serious GHSA-xvch-5gv4-984h Prototype Pollution in minimist
    /workdirs/scan-855cf206-362a-4090-91e4-69bba4937297/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2021-44906). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Serious GHSA-xvch-5gv4-984h Prototype Pollution in minimist
    /workdirs/scan-855cf206-362a-4090-91e4-69bba4937297/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2021-44906). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-4q6p-r6v2-jvc5 Chaijs/get-func-name vulnerable to ReDoS
    /workdirs/scan-855cf206-362a-4090-91e4-69bba4937297/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-43646). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-vh95-rmgr-6w4m Prototype Pollution in minimist
    /workdirs/scan-855cf206-362a-4090-91e4-69bba4937297/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2020-7598). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-vh95-rmgr-6w4m Prototype Pollution in minimist
    /workdirs/scan-855cf206-362a-4090-91e4-69bba4937297/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2020-7598). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-g6ww-v8xp-vmwg Prototype pollution in pathval
    /workdirs/scan-855cf206-362a-4090-91e4-69bba4937297/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2020-7751). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Minor GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx jsdiff has a Denial of Service vulnerability in parsePatch and applyPatch
    /workdirs/scan-855cf206-362a-4090-91e4-69bba4937297/package-lock.json
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-24001). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrep none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddog none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.