github.com/ramitsurana/awesome-kubernetes ↗
ramitsurana/awesome-kubernetes
scanned 2026-06-29 · git 8f4cca9
1 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 4 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional.
Re-check ↻
Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.
🔑Leaked secrets✓📦Vulnerable dependencies✓🧬Known OSS vulnerabilities1⚠️Risky code patterns✓☠️Malicious dependencies—🩺Project health—
Security checks
🔑 Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ
none found ✓
API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT
📦 Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ
none found ✓
Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0
🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ
1 found
Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.
-
Worth fixing PYSEC-2026-215 Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) for Python provides support for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) and Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing. In versions prior
/workdirs/scan-3f4dc918-dc1b-4fdd-9ff5-432c24ef3bbf/requirements.txt
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-45409). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0
⚠️ Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ
none found ✓
Code that can be exploited — injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1
☠️ Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ
timed out
Packages that look intentionally malicious — typosquats, sneaky install scripts.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0
error: pypi:timeout
Project health
A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.
🩺 Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ
didn’t run
Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project — not a vulnerability in your code.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0
About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a
published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.