gitsafehub
github.com/rafaeltonholo/trabalho-alunos-wp ↗

rafaeltonholo/trabalho-alunos-wp

scanned 2026-08-09 · git 89569bb
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets✓Vulnerable dependencies4Known OSS vulnerabilities4Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies✓Project health—

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ 4 found

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-32933 AutoMapper Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) via Uncontrolled Recursion
    CRUDAlunos/CRUDAlunos.App/packages.config
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-32933). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-32933 AutoMapper Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) via Uncontrolled Recursion
    CRUDAlunos/CRUDAlunos.CrossCutting/packages.config
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-32933). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-32933 AutoMapper Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) via Uncontrolled Recursion
    CRUDAlunos/CRUDAlunos.Data/packages.config
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-32933). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing CVE-2026-32933 AutoMapper Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) via Uncontrolled Recursion
    CRUDAlunos/CRUDAlunos/packages.config
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-32933). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ 4 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

  • Worth fixing GHSA-rvv3-g6hj-g44x AutoMapper Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) via Uncontrolled Recursion
    /workdirs/scan-a1c99008-4c8e-4c09-b0f6-2a8a843d2d26/CRUDAlunos/CRUDAlunos.App/packages.config
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-32933). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-rvv3-g6hj-g44x AutoMapper Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) via Uncontrolled Recursion
    /workdirs/scan-a1c99008-4c8e-4c09-b0f6-2a8a843d2d26/CRUDAlunos/CRUDAlunos.CrossCutting/packages.config
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-32933). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-rvv3-g6hj-g44x AutoMapper Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) via Uncontrolled Recursion
    /workdirs/scan-a1c99008-4c8e-4c09-b0f6-2a8a843d2d26/CRUDAlunos/CRUDAlunos.Data/packages.config
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-32933). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-rvv3-g6hj-g44x AutoMapper Vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) via Uncontrolled Recursion
    /workdirs/scan-a1c99008-4c8e-4c09-b0f6-2a8a843d2d26/CRUDAlunos/CRUDAlunos/packages.config
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-32933). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.