gitsafehub
github.com/peng-zhihui/l-ink_card ↗

peng-zhihui/l-ink_card

scanned 2026-06-27 · git 0c85ae1
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
6 checks ran. Start with known oss vulnerabilities below.

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets2Vulnerable dependencies✓Known OSS vulnerabilities5Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies✓Project health11

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ 2 found

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

  • Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
    Firmware/Keil/L-ink_Card/Drivers/BSP/Components/ST25DV/st25dv.h:118
    A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
  • Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
    Firmware/Clion/L-ink_Card/Drivers/BSP/Components/ST25DV/st25dv.h:118
    A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ 5 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

  • Worth fixing PYSEC-2018-28 The Requests package before 2.20.0 for Python sends an HTTP Authorization header to an http URI upon receiving a same-hostname https-to-http redirect, which makes it easier for remote attackers to dis
    /workdirs/scan-59b72896-d826-43cd-a5bd-794eb4af5128/DAP-Link/Firmware/src/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2018-18074). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing PYSEC-2023-74 Requests is a HTTP library. Since Requests 2.3.0, Requests has been leaking Proxy-Authorization headers to destination servers when redirected to an HTTPS endpoint. This is a product of how we use `re
    /workdirs/scan-59b72896-d826-43cd-a5bd-794eb4af5128/DAP-Link/Firmware/src/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-32681). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7 Requests vulnerable to .netrc credentials leak via malicious URLs
    /workdirs/scan-59b72896-d826-43cd-a5bd-794eb4af5128/DAP-Link/Firmware/src/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-47081). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56 Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False
    /workdirs/scan-59b72896-d826-43cd-a5bd-794eb4af5128/DAP-Link/Firmware/src/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-35195). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2 Requests has Insecure Temp File Reuse in its extract_zipped_paths() utility function
    /workdirs/scan-59b72896-d826-43cd-a5bd-794eb4af5128/DAP-Link/Firmware/src/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-25645). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ 11 notes

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

  • Worth fixing scorecard-overall OpenSSF Scorecard overall: 0.4/10
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Binary-Artifacts Binary-Artifacts scored 0: binaries present in source code
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-CII-Best-Practices CII-Best-Practices scored 0: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Code-Review Code-Review scored 0: Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Contributors Contributors scored 0: project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Dependency-Update-Tool Dependency-Update-Tool scored 0: no update tool detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Fuzzing Fuzzing scored 0: project is not fuzzed
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Maintained Maintained scored 0: 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Pinned-Dependencies Pinned-Dependencies scored 0: dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-SAST SAST scored 0: no SAST tool detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Security-Policy Security-Policy scored 0: security policy file not detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.

via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.5.0 · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.