github.com/mic92/vmsh ↗
mic92/vmsh
scanned 2026-08-10 · git dd39175
3 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🔴 Needs attention
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional.
Re-check ↻
Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed .
🔑 Leaked secrets 3 📦 Vulnerable dependencies 3 🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities 4 ⚠️ Risky code patterns ✓ ☠️ Malicious dependencies ✓ 🩺 Project health —
Chat with this repo
Simplify and Visualize This Repo
Self Host this repo
Check out more work of Developer: mic92
Security checks
🔑 Leaked secrets — Gitleaks ⓘ
3 found · 3 serious
API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.
Serious private-key Identified a Private Key, which may compromise cryptographic security and sensitive data encryption.
nix/ssh_key:1
A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
Serious private-key Identified a Private Key, which may compromise cryptographic security and sensitive data encryption.
nix/ssh_key:1
A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
Serious private-key Identified a Private Key, which may compromise cryptographic security and sensitive data encryption.
nix/ssh_key:1
A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT
📦 Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy ⓘ
3 found
Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).
Worth fixing CVE-2023-50711 vmm-sys-util is a collection of modules that provides helpers and util ...
Cargo.lock
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-50711). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-9cc5-2pq7-hfj8 xmas-elf potential out-of-bounds read with a malformed ELF file and the HashTable API.
Cargo.lock
A package you depend on has a known security hole (GHSA-9cc5-2pq7-hfj8). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Minor CVE-2023-41051 In a typical Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) there are several component ...
Cargo.lock
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-41051). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0
🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner ⓘ
4 found
Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.
Worth fixing RUSTSEC-2024-0002 `serde` deserialization for `FamStructWrapper` lacks bound checks that could potentially lead to out-of-bounds memory access
/workdirs/scan-a0ac2c37-22c2-4b17-8284-0cf33d9d78f1/Cargo.lock
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-50711). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing RUSTSEC-2025-0018 Potential out-of-bounds read with a malformed ELF file and the HashTable API.
/workdirs/scan-a0ac2c37-22c2-4b17-8284-0cf33d9d78f1/Cargo.lock
A package you depend on has a known security hole. Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Minor RUSTSEC-2023-0056 Default functions in VolatileMemory trait lack bounds checks, potentially leading to out-of-bounds memory accesses
/workdirs/scan-a0ac2c37-22c2-4b17-8284-0cf33d9d78f1/Cargo.lock
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-41051). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
FYI RUSTSEC-2024-0383 bcc is unmaintained
/workdirs/scan-a0ac2c37-22c2-4b17-8284-0cf33d9d78f1/Cargo.lock
A package you depend on has a known security hole. Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0
⚠️ Risky code patterns — Semgrep ⓘ
none found ✓
Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1
☠️ Malicious dependencies — Guarddog ⓘ
none found ✓
Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0
Project health
A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.
🩺 Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard ⓘ
didn’t run
Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0
About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a
published rule . False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.