locoremind/locotrainer

scanned 2026-08-10 · git 08a2a06

2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue

🟡 Worth a look

Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets✓Vulnerable dependencies1Known OSS vulnerabilities2Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies✓Project health—

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ 1 found

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Worth fixing CVE-2026-45409 python-idna: idna: Denial of Service via specially crafted long inputs

uv.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-45409). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ 2 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Worth fixing PYSEC-2026-2132 Pallets Click, versions 8.3.2 and below, contain a command injection vulnerability in the click.edit() function, allowing attackers to pass arbitrary OS commands from an unprivileged account.

/workdirs/scan-41609c3a-5b27-4d64-abf2-4958d36d91df/uv.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-7246). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing PYSEC-2026-215 Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) for Python provides support for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) and Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing. In versions prior

/workdirs/scan-41609c3a-5b27-4d64-abf2-4958d36d91df/uv.lock

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-45409). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.