gitsafehub
github.com/jwasham/coding-interview-university ↗

jwasham/coding-interview-university

scanned 2026-05-26 · git 717298b
No security issues flagged
🟢 Looks clean
All 6 checks ran. Nothing urgent to fix.

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets✓Vulnerable dependencies✓Known OSS vulnerabilities✓Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies✓Project health11

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ none found ✓

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited — injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious — typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ 11 notes

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project — not a vulnerability in your code.

  • Worth fixing scorecard-overall OpenSSF Scorecard overall: 3.7/10
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Branch-Protection Branch-Protection scored 0: branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-CI-Tests CI-Tests scored 0: 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-CII-Best-Practices CII-Best-Practices scored 0: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Dependency-Update-Tool Dependency-Update-Tool scored 0: no update tool detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Fuzzing Fuzzing scored 0: project is not fuzzed
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Maintained Maintained scored 0: 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Pinned-Dependencies Pinned-Dependencies scored 0: dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-SAST SAST scored 0: SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Security-Policy Security-Policy scored 0: security policy file not detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Token-Permissions Token-Permissions scored 0: detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.

via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.0.0 · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.