Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.
API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).
CVE-2023-45311 Code injection in fseventsCVE-2026-59873 tar: node-tar: Denial of Service via crafted gzip bombCVE-2021-32803 nodejs-tar: Insufficient symlink protection allowing arbitrary file creation and overwriteCVE-2021-32804 nodejs-tar: Insufficient absolute path sanitization allowing arbitrary file creation and overwriteCVE-2021-37701 nodejs-tar: Insufficient symlink protection due to directory cache poisoning using symbolic links allowing arbitrary file creation and overwriteCVE-2021-37712 nodejs-tar: Insufficient symlink protection due to directory cache poisoning using symbolic links allowing arbitrary file creation and overwriteCVE-2021-37713 nodejs-tar: Arbitrary File Creation/Overwrite on Windows via insufficient relative path sanitizationCVE-2026-23745 node-tar: tar: node-tar: Arbitrary file overwrite and symlink poisoning via unsanitized linkpaths in archivesCVE-2026-23950 node-tar: tar: node-tar: Arbitrary file overwrite via Unicode path collision race conditionCVE-2026-24842 node-tar: tar: node-tar: Arbitrary file creation via path traversal bypass in hardlink security checkCVE-2026-26960 node-tar: node-tar: Arbitrary file read/write via malicious archive hardlink creationCVE-2026-29786 node-tar: hardlink path traversal via drive-relative linkpathCVE-2026-31802 tar: tar: File overwrite via drive-relative symlink traversalCVE-2026-59874 tar: Node-tar: Denial of Service via malformed tar archive headerCVE-2024-28863 node-tar: denial of service while parsing a tar file due to lack of folders depth validationCVE-2026-53655 node-tar: node-tar: File smuggling due to inconsistent tar archive parsingCVE-2026-59871 node-tar: node-tar: Denial of Service due to incorrect PAX path handlingCVE-2026-59875 node-tar: node-tar: Denial of Service via crafted archive with NUL bytes in metadataYour dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.
GHSA-67hx-6x53-jw92 Babel vulnerable to arbitrary code execution when compiling specifically crafted malicious codeGHSA-cpq7-6gpm-g9rc cipher-base is missing type checks, leading to hash rewind and passing on crafted dataGHSA-vjh7-7g9h-fjfh Elliptic's private key extraction in ECDSA upon signing a malformed input (e.g. a string)MAL-2023-462 Malicious code in fsevents (npm)GHSA-8r6j-v8pm-fqw3 Code injection in fseventsGHSA-593f-38f6-jp5m Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in koaGHSA-76p3-8jx3-jpfq Prototype pollution in webpack loader-utilsGHSA-76p3-8jx3-jpfq Prototype pollution in webpack loader-utilsGHSA-76p3-8jx3-jpfq Prototype pollution in webpack loader-utilsGHSA-jf85-cpcp-j695 Prototype Pollution in lodashGHSA-pp57-mqmh-44h7 Command Injection in macaddressGHSA-xvch-5gv4-984h Prototype Pollution in minimistGHSA-xvch-5gv4-984h Prototype Pollution in minimistGHSA-fhjf-83wg-r2j9 Prototype Pollution in mixin-deepGHSA-h7cp-r72f-jxh6 pbkdf2 returns predictable uninitialized/zero-filled memory for non-normalized or unimplemented algosGHSA-v62p-rq8g-8h59 pbkdf2 silently disregards Uint8Array input, returning static keysGHSA-4g88-fppr-53pp Prototype Pollution in set-valueGHSA-4g88-fppr-53pp Prototype Pollution in set-valueGHSA-95m3-7q98-8xr5 sha.js is missing type checks leading to hash rewind and passing on crafted dataGHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw node-tar: Decompression/parse DoS via unlimited inputGHSA-29xr-v42j-r956 thenify before 3.3.1 made use of unsafe calls to `eval`.GHSA-968p-4wvh-cqc8 Babel has inefficient RegExp complexity in generated code with .replace when transpiling named capturing groupsGHSA-968p-4wvh-cqc8 Babel has inefficient RegExp complexity in generated code with .replace when transpiling named capturing groupsGHSA-6chw-6frg-f759 Regular Expression Denial of Service in AcornGHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6 ajv has ReDoS when using `$data` optionCode that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.
Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.