github.com/google-deepmind/alphafold ↗
google-deepmind/alphafold
scanned 2026-06-28 · git c77e5d2
1 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional.
Re-check ↻
Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.
🔑Leaked secrets✓📦Vulnerable dependencies✓🧬Known OSS vulnerabilities2⚠️Risky code patterns✓☠️Malicious dependencies—🩺Project health7
Security checks
🔑 Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ
none found ✓
API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT
📦 Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ
none found ✓
Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0
🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ
2 found
Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.
-
Worth fixing PYSEC-2026-215 Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) for Python provides support for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) and Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing. In versions prior
/workdirs/scan-900988e4-1425-40ed-baa5-fd0eca6a0edd/docker/requirements.txt
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-45409). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
-
Worth fixing GHSA-x3vf-39hj-gxr4 Biopython is vulnerable to doctype XML external entity (XXE) injection through Bio.Entrez
/workdirs/scan-900988e4-1425-40ed-baa5-fd0eca6a0edd/requirements.txt
A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2025-68463). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0
⚠️ Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ
none found ✓
Code that can be exploited — injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1
☠️ Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ
couldn’t run
Packages that look intentionally malicious — typosquats, sneaky install scripts.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0
error: pypi:Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/guarddog", line 5, in <module>
from guarddog.cli import cl
Project health
A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.
🩺 Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ
7 notes
Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project — not a vulnerability in your code.
-
Minor scorecard-overall OpenSSF Scorecard overall: 4.1/10
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
-
Minor scorecard-CII-Best-Practices CII-Best-Practices scored 0: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
-
Minor scorecard-Dependency-Update-Tool Dependency-Update-Tool scored 0: no update tool detected
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
-
Minor scorecard-Fuzzing Fuzzing scored 0: project is not fuzzed
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
-
Minor scorecard-Pinned-Dependencies Pinned-Dependencies scored 0: dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
-
Minor scorecard-SAST SAST scored 0: no SAST tool detected
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
-
Minor scorecard-Security-Policy Security-Policy scored 0: security policy file not detected
A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.5.0 · Apache-2.0
About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a
published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.