gitsafehub
github.com/elunez/eladmin ↗

elunez/eladmin

scanned 2026-05-27 · git 55fbf70
1 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 4 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets5Vulnerable dependenciesKnown OSS vulnerabilitiesRisky code patternsMalicious dependenciesProject health7

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaks 5 found

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

  • Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
    eladmin-system/src/main/resources/config/application.yml:60
    A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
  • Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
    eladmin-system/src/main/resources/config/application-prod.yml:85
    A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
  • Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
    eladmin-system/src/main/resources/config/application-prod.yml:85
    A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
  • Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
    eladmin-system/src/main/resources/config/application-dev.yml:83
    A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.
  • Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
    eladmin-system/src/main/resources/config/application-dev.yml:83
    A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy timed out

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

error: timeout after 120s

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner timed out

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

error: timeout after 120s

Risky code patterns — Semgrep none found ✓

Code that can be exploited — injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddog none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious — typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard 7 notes

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project — not a vulnerability in your code.

  • Worth fixing scorecard-overall OpenSSF Scorecard overall: 3.6/10
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-CI-Tests CI-Tests scored 0: 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-CII-Best-Practices CII-Best-Practices scored 0: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Fuzzing Fuzzing scored 0: project is not fuzzed
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-SAST SAST scored 0: SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Security-Policy Security-Policy scored 0: security policy file not detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.
  • Minor scorecard-Vulnerabilities Vulnerabilities scored 0: 89 existing vulnerabilities detected
    A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene) — not a vulnerability in your code.

via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.5.0 · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.