bitvibelabs/hacknplan-mcp

scanned 2026-05-31 · git 9f6a03a

2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue

🟡 Worth a look

6 checks ran. Start with known oss vulnerabilities below.

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets✓Vulnerable dependencies✓Known OSS vulnerabilities7Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies1Project health9

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ 7 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Worth fixing GHSA-9h52-p55h-vw2f Model Context Protocol (MCP) Python SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default

/workdirs/scan-d13102b7-195e-483e-8a76-6209c682031a/requirements.txt

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2025-66416). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-j975-95f5-7wqh MCP Python SDK has Unhandled Exception in Streamable HTTP Transport, Leading to Denial of Service

/workdirs/scan-d13102b7-195e-483e-8a76-6209c682031a/requirements.txt

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2025-53365). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-65pc-fj4g-8rjx Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Specially crafted inputs to idna.encode() can bypass CVE-2024-3651 fix

/workdirs/scan-d13102b7-195e-483e-8a76-6209c682031a/requirements.txt

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-45409). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-59g5-xgcq-4qw3 Denial of service (DoS) via deformation `multipart/form-data` boundary

/workdirs/scan-d13102b7-195e-483e-8a76-6209c682031a/requirements.txt

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-53981). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-mj87-hwqh-73pj python-multipart affected by Denial of Service via large multipart preamble or epilogue data

/workdirs/scan-d13102b7-195e-483e-8a76-6209c682031a/requirements.txt

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-40347). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-pp6c-gr5w-3c5g python-multipart has Denial of Service via unbounded multipart part headers

/workdirs/scan-d13102b7-195e-483e-8a76-6209c682031a/requirements.txt

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-42561). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing GHSA-wp53-j4wj-2cfg Python-Multipart has Arbitrary File Write via Non-Default Configuration

/workdirs/scan-d13102b7-195e-483e-8a76-6209c682031a/requirements.txt

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-24486). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ 1 found

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Worth fixing guarddog-pypi-shady-links shady-links match in mcp 1.27.2

mcp

A dependency shows signs of being intentionally malicious (typosquat, hidden install script, etc.). Fix: Don’t install it until you’ve verified the package. Consider removing it.

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ 9 notes

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

Worth fixing scorecard-overall OpenSSF Scorecard overall: 1.9/10

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-CII-Best-Practices CII-Best-Practices scored 0: no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Code-Review Code-Review scored 0: Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Contributors Contributors scored 0: project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Dependency-Update-Tool Dependency-Update-Tool scored 0: no update tool detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Fuzzing Fuzzing scored 0: project is not fuzzed

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Maintained Maintained scored 0: project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-SAST SAST scored 0: no SAST tool detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.
Minor scorecard-Security-Policy Security-Policy scored 0: security policy file not detected

A project-health signal (maintenance / supply-chain hygiene), not a vulnerability in your code.

via OpenSSF Scorecard v5.5.0 · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.