github.com/bailicangdu/vue2-manage ↗
bailicangdu/vue2-manage
scanned 2026-06-30 · git dca263e
No security issues flagged
🟢 Looks clean so far
Only 3 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional.
Re-check ↻
Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed .
🔑 Leaked secrets — 📦 Vulnerable dependencies ✓ 🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities ✓ ⚠️ Risky code patterns ✓ ☠️ Malicious dependencies — 🩺 Project health —
Chat with this repo
Simplify and Visualize This Repo
Self Host this repo
Check out more work of Developer: bailicangdu
Security checks
🔑 Leaked secrets — Gitleaks ⓘ
timed out
API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT
error: timeout after 30s
📦 Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy ⓘ
none found ✓
Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0
🧬 Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner ⓘ
none found ✓
Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0
⚠️ Risky code patterns — Semgrep ⓘ
none found ✓
Code that can be exploited — injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.
Nothing found by this check. ✓
via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1
☠️ Malicious dependencies — Guarddog ⓘ
timed out
Packages that look intentionally malicious — typosquats, sneaky install scripts.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0
error: npm:timeout
Project health
A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.
🩺 Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard ⓘ
didn’t run
Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project — not a vulnerability in your code.
This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.
via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0
About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a
published rule . False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.