andydotxyz/plexus-utils

scanned 2026-08-11 · git 008275f

1 of 6 checks flagged a security issue

🔴 Needs attention

Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets✓Vulnerable dependencies4Known OSS vulnerabilities✓Risky code patterns✓Malicious dependencies✓Project health—

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaksⓘ none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivyⓘ 4 found · 1 serious

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Serious CVE-2017-1000487 plexus-utils: Mishandled strings in Commandline class allow for command injection

pom.xml

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2017-1000487). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2022-4244 codehaus-plexus: Directory Traversal

pom.xml

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2022-4244). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2025-67030 org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils: Plexus-utils: Directory Traversal in extractFile method

pom.xml

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2025-67030). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
Worth fixing CVE-2022-4245 codehaus-plexus: XML External Entity (XXE) Injection

pom.xml

A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2022-4245). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scannerⓘ none found ✓

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrepⓘ none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddogⓘ none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecardⓘ didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.