gitsafehub
github.com/alhamrizvi-cloud/Inoue ↗

alhamrizvi-cloud/Inoue

scanned 2026-07-26 · git a5b41d1
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🔴 Needs attention
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secretsVulnerable dependenciesKnown OSS vulnerabilities4Risky code patternsMalicious dependencies2Project health

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaks none found ✓

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner 4 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

  • Worth fixing PYSEC-2026-1307 Potential DoS via the Tudoor mechanism in eventlet and dnspython
    /workdirs/scan-2659d5c0-addc-49eb-bcf1-e5b958143a83/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2023-29483). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing PYSEC-2026-1872 Requests vulnerable to .netrc credentials leak via malicious URLs
    /workdirs/scan-2659d5c0-addc-49eb-bcf1-e5b958143a83/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-47081). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing PYSEC-2026-1873 Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False
    /workdirs/scan-2659d5c0-addc-49eb-bcf1-e5b958143a83/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2024-35195). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • Worth fixing PYSEC-2026-2275 Requests is a HTTP library. Prior to version 2.33.0, the `requests.utils.extract_zipped_paths()` utility function uses a predictable filename when extracting files from zip archives into the system te
    /workdirs/scan-2659d5c0-addc-49eb-bcf1-e5b958143a83/requirements.txt
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-25645). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrep none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddog 2 found · 2 serious

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

  • Serious guarddog-pypi-code-execution code-execution match in python-whois 0.9.6
    python-whois
    A dependency shows signs of being intentionally malicious (typosquat, hidden install script, etc.). Fix: Don’t install it until you’ve verified the package. Consider removing it.
  • Serious guarddog-pypi-exfiltrate-sensitive-data exfiltrate-sensitive-data match in python-whois 0.9.6
    python-whois
    A dependency shows signs of being intentionally malicious (typosquat, hidden install script, etc.). Fix: Don’t install it until you’ve verified the package. Consider removing it.

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.