gitsafehub
github.com/Mic92/hestia ↗

Mic92/hestia

scanned 2026-07-25 · git 91a0e07
2 of 6 checks flagged a security issue
🟡 Worth a look
Only 5 of 6 checks finished — treat this as provisional. Re-check ↻

Informational scan, not a security audit. How this is computed.

Leaked secrets1Vulnerable dependenciesKnown OSS vulnerabilities2Risky code patternsMalicious dependenciesProject health

Security checks

Leaked secrets — Gitleaks 1 found

API keys, passwords or tokens committed into the repo.

  • Worth fixing generic-api-key Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
    src/upstream.rs:67
    A credential (key, password or token) appears in your code. Fix: Remove it, rotate the key, and load it from an environment variable instead.

via Gitleaks v8.21.2 · MIT

Vulnerable dependencies — Trivy none found ✓

Packages you depend on that have known security holes (CVEs).

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Trivy v0.70.0 · Apache-2.0

Known OSS vulnerabilities — OSV-Scanner 2 found

Your dependencies cross-checked against the OSV vulnerability database.

  • Worth fixing RUSTSEC-2026-0185 Remote memory exhaustion in quinn-proto from unbounded out-of-order stream reassembly
    /workdirs/scan-d71cd84c-dfe8-4e9c-81bb-05478ff12c5e/Cargo.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole (CVE-2026-25800). Fix: Update that package to its patched version.
  • FYI RUSTSEC-2026-0190 Unsoundness in `Error::downcast_mut()`
    /workdirs/scan-d71cd84c-dfe8-4e9c-81bb-05478ff12c5e/Cargo.lock
    A package you depend on has a known security hole. Fix: Update that package to its patched version.

via OSV-Scanner v1.9.2 · Apache-2.0

Risky code patterns — Semgrep none found ✓

Code that can be exploited: injection, hardcoded credentials and similar.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Semgrep v1.147.0 · LGPL-2.1

Malicious dependencies — Guarddog none found ✓

Packages that look intentionally malicious: typosquats, sneaky install scripts.

Nothing found by this check. ✓

via Guarddog v2.10.0 · Apache-2.0

Project health

A signal about how the project is maintained — not a vulnerability in your code. It doesn’t affect the verdict above.

Project health — OpenSSF Scorecard didn’t run

Maintenance & supply-chain hygiene. A signal about the project, not a vulnerability in your code.

This check didn’t finish — that’s not the same as “clean.” Try Check again above.

via OpenSSF Scorecard · Apache-2.0

About these results. Six open-source checks ran in parallel; every finding is tagged with the tool that produced it. The verdict follows a published rule. False positives and false negatives are normal — a clean scan does not mean the code is secure, and a red verdict does not mean the project is compromised.